So you want good performance accessing those drives, you don’t want to lose all your data if a fly lands in the wrong spot in Belize, and you need read/write access from Mac as well as Windows? Sucks to be you. You’re probably not like me, but if you are, you probably don’t want to be using ExFAT on all of those disks, because ExFAT sucks. If you’re like me, you use Macs and PCs on the same desk, have a pile of external disks ranging from 1-2 terabytes to a bunch of terabytes, and you’ve got a bunch of crap on all of them that needs to move around a lot.
![]() ![]() Ntfs 3G Sierra Mac As WellOn the other, I really prefer Tuxera’s licensing, and it’ll be somewhat rare that I’m using this machine for performance-intensive stuff on the one drive I have where it matters. ConclusionOn the one hand, Paragon is SUBSTANTIALLY faster on the SSD/USB3 test than Tuxera. DiskSo in the end, Paragon is faster, but to a degree that totally doesn’t matter unless you’ve got a ripping-fast external SSD and USB3.0. For the numbers, I’m using BlackMagic’s speed test from the App Store. That matters for the SSD in particular, which can max the bus. Snes emulator mac os x downloadOtherwise, Tuxera’s licensing is better, and performance as good as matters for anything else.I’ll let you know if it nukes my data and demands a ransom in the next few months.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorBen ArchivesCategories |